“Curiosity—the desire to explain how the world works—drives the questions we ask and the investigations we conduct.” - Kerry Emmanuel, MIT
Explorations in science and engineering should have purpose and lead to conclusions and claims. Scientists make claims all the time, but for their claims to be believable, they must be supported by evidence and reasoning. An effective tool for working through this type of scientific explanation is the C-E-R framework (Claim, Evidence, Reasoning) and it offers the perfect opportunity for fourth-graders to begin thinking and communicating like scientists.
The C-E-R framework is a valuable inquiry method that promotes the development of critical thinking skills where students not only evaluate their own arguments, but the claims and arguments of others. Students learn to answer scientific questions by stating what they believe to be true and then providing evidentiary data and rationale to support their belief. Utilizing this practice in science instruction, as well as across all disciplines, increases rigor by incorporating a greater cognitive complexity of thinking. For elementary students who are first learning to engage in scientific argumentation, C-E-R provides a developmentally appropriate approach toward how students connect their experiences with previously learned content, boosting their scientific literacy. If it sounds like a tall task to you, it’s because it is.
Unknowingly, students began engaging in this process a couple of weeks ago when they first started exploring the various structures and functions of plants and animals. Their explorations inspired curiosity about the subject and a desire to analyze factual information, make connections, and evaluate the meaning and implication of it. A great deal of time and thought was spent crafting logical and concise claims, identifying relevant and reliable evidence, and understanding the importance of explaining how the evidence supports their claims. This exercise provoked an intense and meaningful reflection on what they had learned. It provided students with the practice necessary to draw and support appropriate conclusions and the foundation to participate in effective and high-quality argumentation.
Students ultimately crafted their own C-E-R argument about an investigation related to moss and were asked to argue whether or not they believed it was a plant. It was fascinating to observe students effectively evaluate the information they were given and synthesize it with their schema to make a claim and defend it. We spent some time as a whole class afterward discussing the merits of their arguments, identifying any potential holes, sharing the various methods as to how they analyzed and evaluated the data and information they were given, and how they arrived at their conclusions. It was an incredibly meaningful discussion that helped shaped their ideas not only about the topic, but the perspectives and methodology behind organizing their thinking and assembling it into the C-E-R framework.
This week’s guest bloggers reflect on this experience. Enjoy.
Brunsell, Eric. “Designing Science Inquiry: Claim + Evidence + Reasoning = Explanation.” Edutopia, George Lucas Educational Foundation, 25 Sept. 2012
Cusamano, Jennifer, and David Janosz. “Using a Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning Platform With Next Generation Science Standards.” McGraw Hill Education.
No comments:
Post a Comment